Why Every Physician Needs to Understand the Dual Continuum Model

Dr. Anandhan Panneerselvam, MBBS, DPM,
Consultant Psychiatrist, MINDCARE Clinic, Chennai

Fellow, European Association of Psychosomatic Medicine (EAPM)

A Tale of Two Patients

Consider two patients in your clinic today.

Patient A is a 45-year-old software engineer diagnosed with bipolar disorder ten years ago. He takes lithium and quetiapine, sees his psychiatrist quarterly, exercises daily, maintains a loving marriage, mentors junior colleagues, and describes his life as purposeful. His last mood episode was three years ago.

Patient B is a 42-year-old accountant with no psychiatric diagnosis. She passes every screening questionnaire. But she describes her days as empty. She has no close friendships, finds no meaning in her work, sleeps poorly, copes with wine every evening, and when asked how she is, says: “Just surviving.”

Who is mentally healthy?

If your instinct says Patient A, you are challenging one of medicine’s deepest assumptions — that health is merely the absence of disease. This article presents the evidence that mental health and mental illness are two separate dimensions, explains why this matters for every branch of medicine, and offers a practical framework for clinical integration.

The Problem with “No Diagnosis = Healthy”

Medicine has long operated on a single-continuum assumption: you are either sick or well. In cardiology, the absence of heart failure implies cardiac health. In psychiatry, the absence of depression implies mental health. This assumption is wrong, and the consequences are measurable.

The World Health Organization defined mental health in 2004 as “a state of well-being in which the individual realizes his or her own abilities, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to his or her community.” Critically, they added: mental health is “not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”

This is not philosophical aspiration. It is an empirically testable claim. And it has been tested — rigorously.

The Evidence: Two Dimensions, Not One

Corey L.M. Keyes, a sociologist at Emory University, formalized the dual continuum model (also called the “two continua model”) across a series of landmark publications between 2002 and 2010. His work used data from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study — a nationally representative cohort of over 3,000 adults — and applied the same rigour we demand of any diagnostic system.

The foundational finding (Keyes, 2005)

Using confirmatory factor analysis, Keyes compared a single-factor model (one continuum from sick to well) against a two-factor model (illness and well-being as correlated but separate dimensions). The two-factor model was decisively superior. The correlation between mental illness and mental well-being was only r = −0.53 — far from the −1.0 that a single continuum would require.

In practical terms, this means:

• 5% of adults with a diagnosable mental illness still had moderate or high mental well-being
• 5% of adults with no mental illness were languishing — functioning as poorly as those with clinical depression on psychosocial measures
• Only 6% of American adults had “complete mental health” — flourishing with no mental illness

These findings have since been replicated in over 80 studies across 38 countries, including India, with a scoping review (Iasiello et al., 2020) finding 82 of 83 studies supporting the dual continuum model.

The clinical framework: a 2×2 matrix

The model creates four possible clinical states, not two:

Why This Matters Beyond Psychiatry

For the cardiologist

Keyes & Simoes (2012) followed adults for 10 years and found that non-flourishing was associated with a 62% increase in all-cause mortality (OR = 1.62), independent of smoking, physical inactivity, and chronic disease. Languishing predicts cardiovascular events through pathways psychiatrists recognize but cardiologists often miss: chronic cortisol elevation, autonomic dysregulation, systemic inflammation, poor medication adherence, and social isolation. Your patient with well-controlled hypertension who is lonely and purposeless may have a worse prognosis than the one with poorly controlled blood pressure who has a strong social network.

For the endocrinologist

The MIDUS data showed completely mentally healthy adults had the lowest cardiovascular disease risk, fewest chronic conditions, and lowest healthcare utilization. Metabolic syndrome, Type 2 diabetes, and obesity cluster with languishing through shared pathways: circadian disruption, chronic stress-driven HPA axis activation, inflammatory cytokine elevation (IL-6, CRP), and disordered eating as emotional coping. Mental well-being is a metabolic variable.

For the oncologist

Purpose in life, social connection, and positive affect — the components of flourishing — are associated with better immune function, treatment adherence, and survival in cancer patients. A patient in remission who has lost meaning is medically at risk in a way that standard oncology follow-up does not capture.

For the general practitioner

The invisible bottom-right quadrant of the 2×2 matrix — no diagnosis, but not healthy — describes a vast proportion of your patients. They present with medically unexplained symptoms, chronic fatigue, insomnia, vague pain, and frequent visits. They pass every screening tool. They are languishing, and they are 6.6 times more likely to develop a mental illness within 10 years than those who are flourishing (Keyes et al., 2010).

The Diabetes Analogy: Understanding the Two Dimensions

Every physician intuitively understands this distinction in diabetes management:

Disease management = HbA1c, medication titration, complication screening

Health promotion = diet, exercise, weight management, psychological well-being, social support

A diabetic patient with HbA1c of 6.5% who exercises daily, eats well, and has strong family support is managing the disease AND is healthy. A non-diabetic patient with BMI 35, sedentary lifestyle, pre-diabetic glucose levels, and chronic stress is disease-free but not healthy — and is walking towards diabetes.

Mental illness works identically:

Illness management = diagnosis, medication, psychotherapy, crisis intervention

Health promotion = building resilience, fostering meaning/purpose, strengthening social connections, promoting physical activity, improving sleep

These are complementary but different clinical tasks. Reducing symptoms does not automatically build well-being. Building well-being does not automatically eliminate symptoms. Both must be addressed.

Can Patients with Severe Mental Illness Flourish?

The evidence is clear and counter-intuitive:

• Schizophrenia: 28–33% of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders were classified as flourishing in studies using the MHC-SF (Chan et al., 2018; Fava et al., 2019)
• Bipolar disorder: 23% of adults with bipolar disorder achieved complete mental health in Canadian population data (Fuller-Thomson et al., 2024)
• ADHD: 42% of adults with ADHD achieved complete mental health, with physical activity, marriage, and spiritual coping as protective factors (Fuller-Thomson et al., 2022)
• Depression: Individuals who achieved flourishing were 27.6 times more likely to recover from mental illness than those who remained languishing (Iasiello et al., 2019)

These findings demolish therapeutic nihilism. They also demonstrate that flourishing is not the privilege of the diagnosis-free — it is achievable across the full spectrum of psychiatric conditions, just as physical fitness is achievable in well-managed diabetes or controlled hypertension.

Languishing Predicts Future Illness: The 10-Year Evidence

The strongest longitudinal evidence comes from Keyes, Dhingra, & Simoes (2010), tracking 1,723 adults over 10 years in the MIDUS study:

• Adults who remained languishing were 6 times more likely to develop a mental illness than those who remained flourishing
• Those who improved from languishing to moderate cut their risk nearly in half (OR = 3.4)
• Those who improved all the way to flourishing had no greater risk than the always-flourishing group
• Persistent languishing was a stronger predictor of future illness than having had a prior episode (OR = 6.6 vs. 5.0)

This means that nearly 60% of adults without current mental illness were at elevated risk simply because they were not flourishing. For the general physician, this reframes the question from “Does this patient have a diagnosis?” to “Is this patient flourishing?”

Measuring Well-being in Clinical Practice

The Mental Health Continuum – Short Form (MHC-SF) is a validated 14-item instrument that takes 3–5 minutes to complete. It measures three dimensions of well-being:

• Emotional well-being (3 items): feeling happy, interested in life, satisfied
• Social well-being (5 items): social contribution, integration, acceptance, coherence, actualization
• Psychological well-being (6 items): self-acceptance, environmental mastery, positive relations, personal growth, autonomy, purpose in life

The MHC-SF has been validated in 38 countries including India. It is free to use, available in multiple Indian languages, and can be incorporated into routine screening alongside standard instruments like the PHQ-9 or GAD-7. The diagnostic algorithm classifies patients as flourishing, moderate, or languishing.

Practical Implications for All Physicians

1. Ask about well-being, not just symptoms. Add “How meaningful does your life feel right now?” or “Do you feel connected to people who matter to you?” to your clinical encounter. These questions capture a dimension that symptom checklists miss entirely.
2. Recognise the “invisible risk” quadrant. The patient with no diagnosis who is chronically empty, isolated, and purposeless is at significant medical risk — for mental illness, for cardiovascular disease, for early mortality. Do not be reassured by the absence of a DSM diagnosis.
3. Prescribe beyond pills. Physical activity, social connection, sleep hygiene, purposeful engagement, and community participation are interventions on the well-being continuum. They complement pharmacotherapy but address a different dimension.
4. Reframe treatment goals. For patients with chronic mental illness, the goal is not merely symptom reduction. It is a meaningful life — what the recovery movement calls personal recovery: hope, identity, meaning, and empowerment.
5. Use the diabetes analogy with patients. Patients understand that managing diabetes requires both medication and lifestyle. The same framework applies to mental health: treatment manages the illness; lifestyle, purpose, and connection build the health.

The Indian Context

The dual continuum model is not a Western luxury. Singh et al. (2015) validated the MHC-SF in 539 Indian adolescents in Delhi and found 46.4% flourishing — higher than many Western samples. Kanougiya, Daruwalla, & Osrin (2024) confirmed the two continua model in 4,906 women in Mumbai’s informal settlements, finding that low well-being and common mental disorders were independent dimensions.

In the Indian clinical context, where stigma around mental illness remains pervasive and psychiatric services are scarce, the dual continuum model offers a reframe: mental health promotion is not psychiatry. It is the business of every physician, every community health worker, every family. Building resilience, fostering purpose, strengthening social bonds — these are public health interventions that operate on the well-being continuum independently of psychiatric diagnosis and treatment.

For India’s primary care physicians who see the vast majority of patients with somatic presentations of psychological distress — the medically unexplained symptoms, the chronic fatigue, the vague pains that defy investigation — the dual continuum model offers a diagnostic lens: these patients may not have a mental illness, but they are almost certainly not flourishing.

Conclusion

The statement that opened this article — “a person with mental illness can still have good mental health, and a person without mental illness may not have good mental health” — is not a paradox. It is an empirically validated framework with over 80 supporting studies across 38 countries. The clinical implication is simple but transformative: our job as physicians is not just to treat disease. It is to promote health. These are two different tasks, requiring two different sets of tools, and both are essential.

The disease is the diagnosis. The health is the life. As physicians, we have mastered the first. It is time we attended to the second.

Key References

1. Keyes CLM (2002). The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Soc Behav, 43(2):207–222.
2. Keyes CLM (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model. J Consult Clin Psychol, 73(3):539–548.
3. Keyes CLM (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing. Am Psychol, 62(2):95–108.
4. Keyes CLM, Dhingra SS, Simoes EJ (2010). Change in level of positive mental health as a predictor of future risk of mental illness. Am J Public Health, 100(12):2366–2371.
5. Keyes CLM, Simoes EJ (2012). To flourish or not: positive mental health and all-cause mortality. Am J Public Health, 102(11):2164–2172.
6. Lamers SMA et al. (2011). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the MHC-SF. J Clin Psychol, 67(1):99–110.
7. Iasiello M et al. (2020). Mental health and/or mental illness: a scoping review of the dual-continua model. Evidence Base, 1:1–45.
8. Chan RCH et al. (2018). Flourishing with psychosis. Schizophr Bull, 44(4):778–786.
9. Fuller-Thomson E et al. (2022). Flourishing despite ADHD. Int J Appl Posit Psychol, 7:431–461.
10. Iasiello M et al. (2019). Positive mental health as a predictor of recovery from mental illness. J Affect Disord, 251:227–230.
11. Singh K et al. (2015). Mental health and psychosocial functioning in adolescence: an investigation among Indian students from Delhi. J Adolesc, 39:59–69.
12. Kanougiya S et al. (2024). Mental health on two continua: mental wellbeing and common mental disorders in women in urban informal settlements in India. BMC Women’s Health, 24:588.
13. Jeste DV, Palmer BW (Eds.) (2015). Positive Psychiatry: A Clinical Handbook. American Psychiatric Publishing.
14. van Agteren J et al. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing. Nat Hum Behav, 5:631–652.
15. World Health Organization (2004). Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice. Geneva: WHO.

Close More...

We have already seen that the Mind is essentially the functional side of our Brain. This entire process depends on a simple mechanism: Neurons (brain cells) sending and receiving electrochemical signals. When this communication system works perfectly, we stay healthy. But when this transmission is disturbed or lacks order, it leads to Mind Disorders.

1. Electrical Disturbances: Seizures

If the problem is only with the electrical signals between neurons, it causes what we call a Seizure. The type of seizure depends on which part of the brain is affected.

• Example: If the electrical disturbance happens in the temporal region, it is known as Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.

2. Chemical Disturbances: Neurotransmitters

On the other hand, if the chemical signals between neurons are not transmitted in an orderly way—leading to a “disorder”—it creates problems in our thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. These essential chemical messengers are called Neurotransmitters.

Think of them as the “postmen” of the brain. Key neurotransmitters that maintain our mental health include:

• GABA & GLUTAMATE (The balance of calmness and activity)
• SEROTONIN & NOR-ADRENALINE (The regulators of mood)
• ACETYLCHOLINE (The key to memory)
• DOPAMINE (The driver of reward and movement)

3. Clinical Example: The Role of Dopamine

The balance of these chemicals is very important. For example, a hyperdopaminergic state (too much dopamine activity) is a major cause of a broad group of mental health conditions called Psychosis.

In simple terms, Mental health is not a mystery; it is the pure science of the brain’s electrical and chemical balance.

– Dr P. Anandhan, MBBS, DPM, FIPS Psychiatrist

Close More...

In a world filled with diverse philosophical and religious interpretations of the “Mind,” we often overlook the most practical reality: we live in an era driven by science and technology. Therefore, it is only logical to define the mind through the lens of modern medical science.

“Scientifically speaking, the Mind is nothing but the physiological function of the Brain.”

To better understand this, let’s look at how our body works. Every organ in the human body is assigned a specific, vital role:

• Heart: Its physiological purpose is blood CIRCULATION.
• Lungs: Their primary function is breathing, known as RESPIRATION.
• Kidneys: They purify the blood and eliminate toxins through EXCRETION.
• Gastrointestinal Tract: Its role is to facilitate DIGESTION.
• Genital Organs: Their biological service is PROCREATION.
• Sensory Organs: We experience the world through VISION (Eyes), HEARING (Ears), SMELL (Nose), and TASTE (Tongue).

In the same way, the BRAIN performs a specialised role in our body called the MIND.

Beyond managing our thoughts and emotions, the brain exerts centralised control over every other organ. To put it in simpler terms: If we consider the Brain as the Central Government, then all other organs function as various State Governments. They perform their individual duties, but they all operate under the coordination and command of the central authority—the Brain.

Close More...

The Hidden Suffering: Why We Say “I Am Not Mad!”

Internal pain is just as real as external behaviour. Don’t let the fear of ‘labels’ steal your peace.

Stigma surrounding mental health is a global phenomenon, prevalent in both developed and developing nations. This stigma often stems from a misunderstanding of how mental disorders manifest.
The Two Faces of Mind Disorders

Externalising Disorders (Psychosis): Here, the illness manifests in outward behaviour—often perceived as “odd” or “abnormal.” Because these symptoms are visible, mentally quickly brand them with insensitive labels like “Externalisingal.” Ironically, because the symptoms are manifested, these patients are more likely to be brought to medical professionals for scientific treatment.

Internalising Disorders: These are far more common. Here, the battle is entirely internal, fought within the person’s thoughts and emotions. There are no “odd” outward behaviours, so the world sees a “normal” person, while the individual suffers in silence.

The Cost of Silence

These internal struggles are not “minor.” They silently erode:
Productivity & Creativity
Quality of Life
Innebehaviourshe “Am I Mad?” Defense

The biggest tragedy is that people suffering from these internalising disorders often deny their own pain. When a well-wisher suggests seeking professional help, the immediate, defensive reaction is: “Am I mad?”
They compare themselves to those with visible psychotic symptoms, internalising, “I don’t behave like them, so I don’t need a psychiatrist.” This fear of being branded a “mental patient” prevents millions from reclaiming their lives.

The Truth: You don’t have to be “mad” to seek help. Just as you don’t wait for a heart attack to check your blood pressure, you shouldn’t wait for a breakdown to care for your mind.

– Dr. P. Anandhan, MBBS, DPM, FIPS Psychiatrist

Close More...

During the ’90s period, when I was studying medicine, I read in the Davidson textbook of internal medicine as “If the person has the insight, it’s a neurosis. It’s psychosis if he doesn’t have the insight.”

Insight means he realises having a disturbance in mind. If he does not realise, it indicates he lacks insight.

In neurosis, most of the time, the sufferings are internal. In contrast, it is external in Acute psychosis.

There was a belief that,
The famous symptoms of hallucinations and delusions present only in psychosis.
Anxiety, stress, tension, etc. etc. are symptoms of neurosis.

For example, schizophrenia is a psychotic disorder. Depression is a neurotic disorder.

Current understandings about all of the above statements are a little different.
There are people who have schizophrenia, having insight. Most of the people suffering from depressive illnesses and anxiety disorders lack insight. Hallucinations may occur with anxiety and depressive disorders also.

We think that Neurosis is a minor problem, psychosis is a major one. Most of the time, it’s not true.

Minor to whom?.

Many of the psychiatrists themselves don’t understand the severity of the so-called minor disorders.

-Dr Anandhan panneerselvam
January 2005

Close More...

When individuals suffer from Internalizing Mind Disorders—such as deep-seated anxiety, depression, or silent emotional trauma—they often avoid seeking professional psychiatric help. This avoidance is usually driven by social stigma or a lack of insight into their own condition.

However, the human mind naturally seeks relief from its suffering. Depending on an individual’s personality, intelligence, and environment, they often stray into “alternative paths” that offer a temporary soothing effect but fail to address the root cause.

In my clinical experience, I have observed people taking these five dangerous detours:

1. Alcoholism & Substance Use

For many, alcohol becomes a form of “self-medication.” It provides a temporary numbness to their emotional pain. What starts as a way to escape stress often ends in a devastating cycle of addiction.

2. Extreme Spirituality

While healthy spirituality can be supportive, some use it as an “Escape Mechanism.” Instead of treating a chemical imbalance in the brain, they may spend years in isolation or extreme rituals, hoping for a miracle, while the underlying disorder worsens.

3. Radicalism & Extremism

Sometimes, a disturbed mind finds a sense of “purpose” or “belonging” in extremist ideologies. The anger and frustration caused by an untreated mental disorder can be easily manipulated into radical beliefs or aggressive social stances.

4. Mythology over Reality

Many people tend to view their mental struggles through the lens of mythology or supernatural beliefs. They may attribute their suffering to “curses” or “planetary positions,” spending vast amounts of time and money on rituals instead of scientific treatment.

5. Doctor-Shopping

This is a very common phenomenon. Patients visit multiple specialists—cardiologists, neurologists, or gastrologists—complaining of physical symptoms (psychosomatic) like chest pain or stomach issues. They keep “shopping” for a new doctor, hoping for a physical diagnosis because it is socially easier to accept a “physical” illness than a “mental” one.

The Bottom Line

These paths may offer a momentary “soothing effect,” but they are essentially masks for untreated mental agony. Seeking professional help is not a sign of weakness; it is the only scientific way to reclaim a quality life.

– Dr. P. Anandhan, MBBS, DPM, FIPS Psychiatrist

Close More...

The stigma among mind disorders exists all over the world, irrespective of whether it’s a developed or underdeveloped country. Because sometimes, the effects of the illness reflected in the behaviours of the person. So others troubled when seeing the reactions of that person. If those reactions are odd and abnormal, people brand them as ‘mad’ ‘mental’ ‘loose’ ‘nut’ etc. etc.

The effects of the disease revealed externally as behavioural problems, only in psychotic disorders. So people having these externalising disorders seek or brought to the health professionals and getting appropriate scientific treatments.

But in most of the mind disorders, the impacts happening internally within the person’s thoughts and emotions.

Those internalising disorders are very common among human beings which affects productivity, creativity, quality of life and all of the above the inner peace of that person.

People who are suffering from the most common internalising disorders denies their sufferings and refuse to seek professional help,
Because due to the fear of others may brand them as a “mental patient”. Also, they feel “I am not having such odd and abnormal symptoms like the people having externalising psychotic disorders, the why I need to consult a psychiatrist?”.

So, if the well-wisher’s advice to get professional help, their sudden reaction will be “am I mad?.

– Dr Anandhan panneerselvam
January 2005

Close More...

Close More...

Highly reliable and time tested treatment option இது 20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன்பு வரை  “ஷாக் ட்ரீட்மெண்ட்” என புழக்கத்தில் இருந்தது. அன்றைய காலகட்டத்தில் பயன்படுத்த பட்ட கருவிகள் வேறு.அன்று ஃபோன் செய்ய  STD பூத்களில் மணிக்கணக்கில் காத்திருப்போம் அல்லவா?. ஆனால் இன்று ஸ்மார்ட் ஃபோன் மூலம் அமெரிக்காவில் இருக்கும் உறவினருடன் சில விநாடிகளில் பேசி விடுகிறோமே!.

அதே போல இன்று பயன் படுத்த படும் ECT கருவிகளில்  Brief pulse, Ultra brief pulse மற்றும்  unilateral frontal என்றெல்லாம் வந்து விட்டது. ஆகையினால், அந்த நபரின் வயது உட்பட பல காரணிகளை கருத்தில் கொண்டு மென்மையாக கையாளப்படுகிறது.

பழங்கால சினிமாக்களில் வருவதை போல ஆக்ரோஷமாக, வலிப்பு வருவதெல்லாம் இன்று வராது. காரணம் பெரும்பாலும்  மயக்க மருந்து  நிபுணர் இந்த சிகிச்சையில் முக்கியமான பங்கு வகிக்கிறார். ஆகையினால்,  தசைகள் உட்பட மொத்த உடலுமே  இலகுவாக ஆகிவிடுவதால், வலியோ வேறு பக்க விளைவுகளோ வராது.

ஆனால், சிலருக்கு ஞாபகமறதி இருக்கலாம். பயப்பட தேவையில்லை. நான்கு மணி நேரத்தில் கொஞ்சம் கொஞ்சமாக சரியாகிவிடும்.

நாம் முக்கியமாக புரிந்து கொள்ள வேண்டியது,  இது ஷாக் ட்ரீட்மெண்ட் கிடையாது. மிதமான(சில நொடிகள் முதல் சில நிமிடங்கள்) எலக்ரிக்கல் சக்தி மூலமாக மூளை தூண்டப்படுகிறது.

ஆகையினால், மாத கணக்கில் சிலருக்கு வருடக்கணக்கில்  மாத்திரைகள் கொடுத்தும்  போதுமான பலன் கிடைக்காத பட்சத்தில் இந்த சிகிச்சையில் வியக்கத்தக்க முன்னேற்றம் ஏற்படும்.

“இத்தனை வருடங்களை வீணாக்கி விட்டோமே” என வருத்தபடுபவர்களை அன்றாடம் பார்க்கிறேன்.

“இந்த சிகிச்சை வியாதி அதிகமானவர்களுக்கு தான் கொடுப்பார்கள்” என்பது தவறான நம்பிக்கை.

அதே போல “கவுன்ஸ்லிங், மாத்திரைகள் வேலை செய்யாத பட்சத்தில் கடைசி நிலையில் தான் கொடுப்பார்கள்” என்பதும் தவறான நம்பிக்கை.

இந்த சிகிச்சை கொடுப்பதால் மூளை செல்கள் பாதிப்படையாது. மாறாக புதிதாக மூளை செல்களை உருவாக்கி மூளையின் செயல் திறனை அதிகபடுத்தும்.

இந்த வயதில் தாங்குமா? போன்ற பயங்கள் தேவையில்லை. உலகம் முழுவதும் இந்த சிகிச்சை எழுபது வயதை கடந்தவர்களுக்கு தான் அதிகம் கொடுக்கப்படுகிறது. மேலும், 18 முதல் 25 வயது வரையிலான காலகட்டத்திலும் அதிகம் தேவைப்படுகிறது.

மூளை ஊக்க சிகிச்சை( ECT )
• ECT is a brain stimulation treatment. Not a brain-damaging treatment.

•  “Shock treatment”-terminology is misguiding the common man.

• In ECT, we are giving few milliseconds to 2 to 3 minutes of mild electrical stimulation.

• In ECT,  new brain cells are generating and regain the potential of the mind.

• No significant long term side effects. Mild and temporary memory disturbance may occur. But it is reversible within a few hours.

• It is not for the advanced stage of illnesses. Recent researches recommend ECT as the first line of treatment for selected cases.

• We can give after 18 years of age to a hundred years of age person.

• Many of the bedridden older adults without any significant illnesses are responding to ECT dramatically.

– Dr Anandhan panneerselvam
January 2005

Close More...